Emotion Review |Enero 2016; 8 (1)

ER Enero 2016

Consulta la tabla de contenido del número de la
Revista Emotion Review


Special Section: Emotion and Law

  • Terry A. Maroney
    A Field Evolves: Introduction to the Special Section on Law and Emotion
    Full Text (PDF)
  • Robin L. Kaplan, Ilse Van Damme, Linda J. Levine, and Elizabeth F. Loftus
    Emotion and False Memory
    Full Text (PDF)
  • Phoebe C. Ellsworth and Adrienne Dougherty
    Appraisals and Reappraisals in the Courtroom
    Full Text (PDF)
  • Neal Feigenson
    Jurors’ Emotions and Judgments of Legal Responsibility and Blame: What Does the Experimental Research Tell Us?
    Full Text (PDF)
  • Stina Bergman Blix and Åsa Wettergren
    A Sociological Perspective on Emotions in the Judiciary
    Full Text (PDF)
  • Susanne Karstedt
    The Emotion Dynamics of Transitional Justice: An Emotion Sharing Perspective
    Full Text (PDF)



  • Rosalind W. Picard, Szymon Fedor, and Yadid Ayzenberg
    Multiple Arousal Theory and Daily-Life Electrodermal Activity Asymmetry
    Full Text (PDF)



  • Hugo D. Critchley and Yoko Nagai
    Comment: What Does Left–Right Autonomic Asymmetry Signify?
    Full Text (PDF)
  • Wendy Berry Mendes
    Comment: Looking for Affective Meaning in “Multiple Arousal” Theory: A Comment to Picard, Fedor, and Ayzenberg
    Full Text (PDF)
  • Greg J. Norman
    Comment: Emotional and Autonomic Arousal Constructs in Psychophysiological Research: Where Do We Go From Here?
    Full Text (PDF)
  • Dean Sabatinelli
    Comment: The Methodological and Conceptual Utility of Differentiating Emotional Arousal
    Full Text (PDF)
  • Michael Richter
    Comment: Where is the Theory? A Critical Comment on Multiple Arousal Theory
    Full Text (PDF)


Author Reply

  • Rosalind W. Picard, Szymon Fedor, and Yadid Ayzenberg
    Response to Commentaries on “Multiple Arousal Theory and Daily-Life Electrodermal Activity Asymmetry”
    Full Text (PDF)
  • Wendy Wood
    Reply to Gangestad’s (2016) Comment on Wood, Kressel, Joshi, and Louie (2014)
    Full Text (PDF)



  • Steven W. Gangestad
    Comment: Wood et al.’s (2014) Speculations of Inappropriate Research Practices in Ovulatory Cycle Studies
    Full Text (PDF)

Deja una respuesta

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *